 |
 |
 |
 |
#433274 - 09/04/08 10:51 AM
Re: Sea Ray heads - Portapotty vs. vacuflush
[Re: jattea]
|
Admiral
Registered: 08/06/05
Posts: 2067
Loc: Glen Cove, New York
|
jonathan - you';re likely to get as many opinions on which type of system is better as there are butts around here, so here are some facts. some portapotties must be emptied by detaching the tank portion and physically carrying it out of the boat and dumping it. others have a relatively small (5 gallon max), integrated holding tank and have a hose, plumbed to a deck fitting. they're emptied by going to a pumpout station and attaching a vacuum to the deck fitting and sucking the contents out of the small holding tank. permament heads either use a manual hand pump or vacuum system (like the vacuuflush) to move waste from the toilet down a hose into a separate, relatively large (20 gallons or more) holding tank. the holding tank is then plumbed to a deck fitting and emptied at a pumpout station. a macerator is a kind of grinder, cutting up waste so it can easily exit the boat. however, i think macerators are for grinding up waste before they're dumped directly overboard, which is not allowed unless you're several miles out to sea. the advantages of a portapotty is simplicity of installation, maintenance (no trying to find a clog in a waste hose) and usually less odor because of it's small holding tank and no hoses (over time, the hoses of a permanent head become the weak link in the system and leak odor). the advantages of a permanent head is the larger holding tank that will hold stuff more for day or overnight trips, meaning less trips to the pumpout station (which in some cases, you'll be charged for), and ease of use. retrofitting a permanenelty plumbed head into a boat that only has a portapotty will be expensive. our first boat (a 26' express cruiser) had a plumbed portapotty and it was fine for our uses (mostly day trips with few guests aboard) but it had to be emptied fairly frequently. our current boat has a permanent manual head and it works for us as well. with any type of system, you need to drill into everyone's heads NOT to put anything in the head other than the marine toilet paper you supply and whatever comes out of their bodies that was once food or drink.
Edited by BToran (09/04/08 10:57 AM)
_________________________
Bruce Toran 1996 Carver 320 Voyager ----------------------------------------- "Don't Eat Anything Bigger Than Your Head"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#433418 - 09/04/08 09:13 PM
Re: Sea Ray heads - Portapotty vs. vacuflush
[Re: Cap'nBrian]
|
Admiral
Registered: 10/29/04
Posts: 7502
Loc: Peoria, Illinois
|
Not me Brian. Al may love them, but my dad's vacuflush head in his Chap was "troublesome" all the time. However, his manual flush head in his Regal was troublesome too, as it lost prime all the time.
The head that he had no trouble with, other than it was 10 years old and had to have a couple of seals replaced... his portipotty in his 1989 Searay 268. And I know some of you don't believe this, but it was a true portipotty in that you could remove it from the head compartment and dump it in a toilet, or you could open a valve, and let it fill up the onboard holding tank, and have it pumped out. This system allowed the best of both worlds, no pump out needed for little weekend trips, and the ability to have a large waste tank for week long trips.
_________________________
I'm just happy to be here!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#433427 - 09/04/08 09:40 PM
Re: Sea Ray heads - Portapotty vs. vacuflush
[Re: BillyB]
|
Admiral
Registered: 02/04/04
Posts: 1126
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
|
Of course, ANY product might have issues, but the SeaLand vacu-flush system, when properly installed and maintained, is a very reliable and effective waste system.
I went to SeaLand school quite a few years ago, and have installed a few systems myself, and I have never personally seen an issue with them that wasn't caused by operator error.
Sure, pumps do wear out, and pieces eventually will break, but that is true with anything.
Even Rolls Royce's...
Yeah, the manual pump heads that I have had all lost their prime every now and then. I finally learned to take the hose clamp off of the water intake line so I could easily slip it off and put my thumb on it to "prime the pump".
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#433565 - 09/05/08 01:38 PM
Re: Sea Ray heads - Portapotty vs. vacuflush
[Re: ABoater]
|
Vice Admiral
Registered: 08/04/04
Posts: 499
|
And actually, the raw water has "worries" of its own.
The intake can get clogged with sea "creatures".
The intake itself can have issues.
The intake should have a seacock, which should be serviced regularly (but are usually in hard to reach spaces).
Well sure, but if it corectly utilized and maintained then no worries. Same can be said for any through hull for AC, generator cooling, etc. There are way more pieces on a vacu-flush system to wear, break, malfunction than the manual pump. If you stay on the hook for many days (in smaller cruiser) and have limited fresh water supply which is being used for showers, dishes, hand washing, etc, do you really want to be "flushing" it too?
Edited by Cap'nBrian (09/05/08 01:42 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|