 |
 |
 |
 |
#419913 - 07/07/08 01:04 PM
Re: Double nickle
[Re: D-Rod]
|
Admiral
Registered: 06/25/05
Posts: 7471
|
It's 140 miles from here to Independence, my home town. 2 hour and 10 minutes of travel time, all of which is 2 lane undivided highway. Before the speed limits were boosted, it used to take almost 3 hours. 140 miles in this part is considered a SHORT drive. Typical would be in the 200-300 mile range. It quickly impacts travel time. And the efficiency gains are NOT there.
As mentioned, a better option is to be more aggressive on limiting those who drive too fast.
PH is about to make a trip to Colorado. Last time I was there was Spring 2007. Driving across Western Kansas, eastern Colorado, we had the cruise set on 85mph. Often times, we would speed up to 90mph for a little while if a couple of cars passed us. Why not keep up with them right? Over 170 miles between a couple of areas, I calculated we averaged 86mph. Yea! It didn't take 2 hours to go 170 miles. We had 3 vehicles in our convoy. That's excessive. We should have stayed down closer to 75/80mph. However, I can't imagine driving through there at 65 or 70mph (pushing the 55 limit). I know most trucks cannot exceed 65mph, maybe 70mph now thanks to governors. However, what if these trucks slowed to 60mph? Ouch!!
I still place bets on the speed limits not dropping to 55. Worse case scenario is I can see a 65mph speed limit imposed, meaning states with 70 or 75mph speed limits would have to reduce them. Just cannot see making everything 55 again.
_________________________
Live your life in the Kelvin scale..........Stay Positive.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|