 |
 |
 |
 |
#399980 - 04/24/08 08:27 PM
Nuclear Energy is back
|
Admiral
Registered: 06/25/05
Posts: 7542
|
http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/new-licensing-files/expected-new-rx-applications.pdfAbout Freaking Time! As most of you know, the NRC started issuing licenses last Fall. I did not know they were issuing them at this accelerated rate! Wow! We're increasing our Nuclear output by 33% in 3 years (not including construction time). That's impressive! Some of these reactors are at existing plants. That's good. Good logistics in adding capacity at existing plants (and some reactors do retire soon). At any rate, I just finished an introduction to Nuclear chemistry chapter. After I learned the Science behind the plants and how safe they ARE, I became annoyed we ran away from the technology. What are your thoughts on this? BTW: 1000MW Coal plant dumps around 35,000 TONS of SO2, Sulfur Dioxide; 4,500,000 TONS of Carbon Dioxide, and about 3,500,000 cubic feet of ash. A 1000MW Nuclear plant? 70 cubic feet of vitrified waste.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#400012 - 04/24/08 09:40 PM
Re: Nuclear Energy is back
[Re: D-Rod]
|
Admiral
Registered: 06/25/05
Posts: 7542
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|