 |
 |
 |
 |
#394785 - 04/05/08 03:46 PM
Re: Second battery install...
[Re: Wet Doggg]
|
Admiral
Registered: 11/06/03
Posts: 5179
Loc: Buffalo, NY
|
This is from AskJackrabbit.com. Question was asked by a guy with a 34' Silverton with regard to wire and fuse size.
Jack Rabbit: Sizing wire for starter cables is not so easy. The usual ABYC tables are set up to size wire for continuous use. With a starter, you have a very high current for a second or so, and then no current at all until next time you start the engine. Your engine manual may specify the expected starter current, or it may specify the CCA rating needed for the start battery which is much the same thing. The ampacity rating of 2/0 wire is 330A and that of 4/0 is 445A, i.e. the maximum continuous current that the wire can handle without overheating. Your starter motor might take 500+A for a brief time. The safe approach is to put on at least 2/0 cable for any starter circuit as even though this has a lower ampacity than the expected current, there is not time for it to heat up significantly. Be careful about repeated attempts at starting.
Any fuse you put in a starter circuit is going to have to be able to handle this high current for a short time. I would use an ANL fuse rated at about 125% of the expected starter current - you can get these fuses rated at up to 750A. Don't put fuses in any negative cables, they should always be on the positive side.
With a 500A load, 2/0 cable will give a 6.7% voltage drop in a 20 ft round-trip circuit. Using 4/0 cable will bring that drop down to 4.2%.
The starter circuit should have the same gauge wire throughout its length. That means from the start battery to the battery switch, and on up to the starter (positive), then from the engine block back to the battery bank (negative). As there might come a day when you start the engine from the house bank, the cable from the house bank to the battery switch should also be the same gauge, as should the negative cable from the house bank to the engine block.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#394789 - 04/05/08 03:57 PM
Re: Second battery install...
[Re: F14bombcat]
|
Admiral
Registered: 11/06/03
Posts: 5179
Loc: Buffalo, NY
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#394790 - 04/05/08 04:00 PM
Re: Second battery install...
[Re: F14bombcat]
|
Scallywag
Admiral
Registered: 06/21/04
Posts: 10150
Loc: West Michigan
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#394944 - 04/06/08 06:46 AM
Re: Second battery install...
[Re: trooplewis]
|
Nautical Alchemist
Admiral
Registered: 01/14/03
Posts: 14663
Loc: Battle Creek/Grand Haven, MI
|
Forgive me troop, but I have to disagree a bit. Using a battery-to-battery ground is not best practice in my opinion, especially if you are going to potentially start the engine with either battery via 1-both-2 switch. To meet federal law and ABYC recommendations, the grounding circuit to the engine must handle the entire load, which means, in this case - both batteries. If this were a twin engine installation, seperate grounds for each battery would be mandatory as federal law. Doggg, I don't want to get into parts selection for you, but consider Blue Sea's "Add a battery kit" http://bluesea.com/category/1/productline/overview/329It includes a switch and a combiner - Blue Sea's "version" of the Yandina combiner. Whichever hardware you go with, assuming you want both batteries for starting, I would recommend the use of both a switch and a combiner. There are some high-current combiners on the market so you can forgoe the switch, but I like the ability to select the "mode of operation" with a switch. I buy all my wire from here: www.genuinedealz.comIts all marine grade. They can make custom length battery cables for you with the ends already attached. Just give them the length you need. They charge you a buck an end for labor to install the connectors.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#394987 - 04/06/08 09:03 AM
Re: Second battery install...
[Re: Al]
|
Admiral
Registered: 11/06/03
Posts: 5179
Loc: Buffalo, NY
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#394990 - 04/06/08 09:19 AM
Re: Second battery install...
[Re: trooplewis]
|
Nautical Alchemist
Admiral
Registered: 01/14/03
Posts: 14663
Loc: Battle Creek/Grand Haven, MI
|
Except that both batteries are sharing the same ground. Since its my contention that any disagreement should be within the course of reasoning rather than being simply argumentative, please realize that I respect your opinion, and want to make this conversation simply a statement of what others say. I'll offer the reasoning the USCG publishes as to why the grounding should be done in this manner: The purpose of this requirement is to prevent accidental passage of the battery supply current through fuel systems and smaller electrical conductors that may be common to engines. If one of the grounded cranking motor circuits accidentally opens (breaks) due to corrosion, vibration, etc., the accidental passage of starter motor current could melt fuel lines or burn up smaller conductors such as instrument wiring. Both of these hazards could lead to fire and explosion accidents. The common conductor circuit referred to in the regulation is a circuit made up of jumper conductors and may include a common bus bar.
While again this discusses dual engines, the same situation might occur in a single engine with two batteries, if both batteries can potentially be used for starting, and there is only one ground wire from both batteries to the engine. I'd be willing to bet that if you got a single-engine, dual battery set up from the factory with a brand new boat, they would set it up as diagram #1 above.
That might very well be true for some manufacturers, however, I am talking best practice here, and ofen in a retrofit, especially if the batteries are not located adjacent to each other, its no more costly to run a ground to each engine - so why would it not be the prudent thing to do.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|